Search for: "FORBES et al v. JOHNSON" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
” [Phil Goldberg, Forbes] Study of contingent fee litigation in New York City: few cases resolved on dispositive motions, lawyers nearly always take the maximum one-third permitted by law [Eric Helland et al., forthcoming Vanderbilt Law Review/SSRN] Tags: asbestos, Canada, contingent fee, NYC, Richard Epstein, social media, terrorism Liability roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm by Schachtman
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Nos. 16-11051, et al., 2018 U.S. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09380-19 Clattenburg v dailystar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08479-19 Forbes v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 08417-19 Cooney et al. v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 08376-19 Malone v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2… [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had a piece “Social Media Is Failing To Eliminate Fake Content”. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]